HomeSearchScheduleSubjectsSavedAsk the advisor
Your account 
Pricing
Sign in
  • Home
  • Search
  • Schedule
  • Advisor
  • Profile

Bennett, Clint Dominic G. teaches at Ateneo de Manila University. Across 16 comments from students, they hold a rating of 3.5 out of 5. Of those comments, 7 read positive, 4 read mixed, 2 read neutral and 3 read negative. They are listed for 7 sections this term.

  1. profstopick
  2. Bennett, Clint Dominic G.

Bennett, Clint Dominic G.

Ateneo de Manila University · 16 comments

What students said

  • positive 7
  • neutral 2
  • mixed 4
  • negative 3
Bennett, Clint Dominic G.3.5

Background

Education · Career · Courses · PublicationsShowHide

Assistant Professor · Assistant Professor (IV) · MS

Optics and photonics (photonic integrated circuits, optical filters, microring resonators) · Space weather · Physics education (circuit analogues of special relativity, undergraduate research experiences)

Education

  • MS Physics, Ateneo de Manila University

Career

  • Assistant Professor, Ateneo de Manila University · Department of Physics · current
  • Head/Coordinator, Ateneo Theoretical Research Group, Ateneo de Manila University · Department of Physics · current

Recent courses

  • PHYS 160
  • PHYS 162.01I
  • PHYS 162.02
  • PHYS 199.1
  • PHYS 199.2
  • PHYS 199.3
  • PHYS 199.4
  • STS 10

Selected work

  • Publication-driven research experience for undergraduates (REU) program in optics and photonics in the Philippines using circuit analogue-based research experiments (2021, Education and Training in Optics and Photonics Conference 2021 (Optica Publishing Group))
  • Smartphone-as-Testbed-Laboratory: Alternative to the typical brick-and-mortar undergraduate physics/electronics laboratory in the time of Covid19 pandemic (2021, Luzon Regional Scientific Meeting 2021, National Academy of Science and Technology (digital poster))
  • Smartphone-based approach to demonstrating relativistic aberration of light using electronic circuit analogues for undergraduates in the Philippines (2023, Proceedings of SPIE 12723, Seventeenth Conference on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics: ETOP 2023, 127231E)
  • Concept Connectivity: An educational and research framework for scientific learning in optics, photonics, and electronic education (2023, Seventeenth Conference on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics: ETOP 2023, paper 127231G)
  • 'Ultraslow-light' and flipping property of the crisscrossed-assisted coupled-ring reflector (2023, 2023 IEEE Silicon Photonics Conference (SiPhotonics))
  • Graphene-Coated Microring Resonator (MRR)-based Gas Sensor using Novel Intensity-Level Detection for low-cost, rapid, and label-free Sensing: Preliminary Simulated Results (2024, 2024 4th URSI Atlantic Radio Science Meeting (AT-RASC))
  • Numerical Approach to the Optimization of the Bandwidth Tunability of a Non-Cascaded Multifunctional Optical Filter (2025, OECC/PSC 2025 — 30th OptoElectronics and Communications Conference / International Conference on Photonics in Switching and Computing 2025)
  • Photonic Integrated Circuit (PIC)-based Sin-Sin2 Frequency Discriminator (FD) filter for 5G Application: SEM Engineering Analysis (2025, 2025 IEEE 34th Wireless and Optical Communications Conference (WOCC 2025))

Comments

Others(0)(1)

Top comments

Swift Koala

Not A-able, late grades, no feedback

positive
  • Retake?No
  • 4.0 attainableNo
  • LeniencyNo
hi took him this intersession 2425 would not recommend at all, imo he's not A-able its true that he doesn't give constructive feedback and grades super late. after our first report, we asked him twice, on canvas and in person, to tell us his comments and what parts of our report we could improve on for our second report in the upcoming weeks, but he said we should just wait til he's done checking our papers. he ended up grading our work in the last few days of intersession when both of our reports were done alr and didn't even indicate how we were graded based on the rubrics, nor did he give any constructive feedback, which was questionable it was frustrating because how would we know where we went wrong diba and our grade suffered because he didnt tell us how to improve according to his standards workload: for grpwrks we had 1 db, 2 written and oral reports, and 1 infographic. then 1 indiv reflection paper to end on a good note, he is nice and tries to be funny and he knows what he’s talking about but yeah avoid his class if u can unless u can read his mind and submit outputs to his standard hahamore
Anonymous

Chill and light, but you will not learn much

mixed
  • Retake?No
  • LeniencyYes
  • WorkloadLight
Took sir Bennett last year (SY 24-25), most people I know who also took his class got a B+ so I don’t think he grades low, but wouldn’t really recommend him if you want to learn. [Classes]: -Laidback and chill, he taught for the first few sessions but he had so many slides and had a somewhat monotonous and faint voice so it felt boring. -Not strict/terror and makes dry jokes lol -Might call people randomly to share their insights if no one recites. [Workload]: -I’d say pretty light since I took his class during a busy semester. -I don’t remember us having quizzes or tests. -Most tasks were done by group. That’s 1-2 discussion boards, 1 group infographic, and 2 group presentations with a written report. 1 individual infographic. -There were like 5-6 groups, with one group presenting per week. A range of topics per module were given for us to choose from. The presentations have to last for 45 mins and he will be asking questions afterwards. -Deadlines were evenly spaced. Overall, he’s not too bad and extends deadlines if the class asks him to. It’s just that you won’t be getting too much out of his class.more
Anonymous
  • CoursePHYS 160
[REVIEW] - throuhgout the sem, he is not quick to return lab reports, only returned the first one, thus idk what's going on with other lab reports that cause my grade to pull down - makes jokes, not strict - he teaches (a bit), but unfortunately most of us (or prolly all of us) have to self study our way to deal with long tests - SPEAKING OF LONG TEST, he's strict asf in checking that one minor mistake costs half to all 10 points in that item, thus there are bunch of us whose scores are below passing in at least one exam, and majority of us are barely passing at all. Phys 160 itself is understandably difficult, but he makes our experience with the subject more difficult. It makes my motivation to enter this class @ 8 in the morning less and less as time goes on. Thus, he is not the prof I can truly recommend. To repeat what someone said here, NOT GOATED, so if you see his name again in one of the profs teaching this subject, pls pray to st. ignatius that u'll not ended up enlisted to his class.more

All comments

Anonymous
positive
I was also the beadle for this class and he really doesn't require much as he does the attendance checking and things like that by himself. And asking for deadline extensions for lab reports went smoothly anyway so no problems there.more
Calm Puffin

Not terror but boring, late unclear comments

negative
i had him for sts during intersession...he's not naman like terror, his classes can get boring and he might like call you out of nowhere to answer his question (recitation is part of your grade) honestly you can get by not reciting much (i remember only ever reciting twice in his entire class) and i got a b/b+ in the end. also, at least try to show ur listening bc he keeps stating u don't need to take notes bc he posted everything on canvas as for grading, he's kinda...unclear when giving comments and he gives them back rly late even if u ask him for any point of improvement he'll tell you to refer to his rubric 😭more
Brave Gecko
mixed
Sir Bennett is, to me, a memorable prof to say the least. I think he does try his best and wants you to learn, but the class has a few glaring problems that make it very, very hard to A. This is a course where interest in the subject matter can help you get through it, in my opinion.more
Witty Heron

Would not recommend: downward curve, little feedback

positive
  • Retake?No
  • LeniencyNo
  • WorkloadLight
hi groupmate ! to elaborate, would not recommend classes: first few classes are a bit dragging, but that might be because we had a disadvantageous room and time (around lunch time in a non-airconditioned room), and the rest are mostly group reports so we carried our own classes. he gives a set of topics you can choose from but you can also give a topic that's related to any of them and it'll be okay. this happens three times in the semester workload: group reports (both the presentation and the paper afaik), an infographic, and a reflection paper on climate change. manageable grading: ????? i'd argue that if there's a curve it's downward. he gave little to no feedback for any of our group reports, and those can really pull your grade down because there's nothing else. he also releases grades the day (the midnight) before aisis grade release. overall, good luck! <33more
Quiet Seal
Most importantly, I cannot stress how essential the textbook is to surviving this course. The Canvas glosses over all the topics you need to go through the exam, but the textbook provides all of that alongside more detailed explanations and examples, as well as practice problems to give you an idea of what kind of questions might appear in the exams. The Canvas and slide sets used in class are mostly copied from the book anyway, so studying the book is essentially studying those two as well.more
Anonymous
Long review: + Lenient with deadlines + Patient, approachable; answers any questions you might have + Really funny guy being in his class was fun at times - Returns assessments very late - Exams have no partial points - full marks on a question or bust (somewhat balances this by giving easy questions but the questions get progressively harder) - Canvas is lacking in terms of explanationsmore
Lively Moth
  • CourseSTS 10
Review on STS 10 SY 23-24 1st SEM: - Almost Impossible to get A and is super subjective (tho B+ is possible) - Gives 0 feedbacks throughout the sem - Funny and makes jokes - Isn’t strict - Doesn’t really teach - 2 Group Reporting of 45 min to 1 hr TLDR: Grading is super suspicious and random to say the least. NOT GOATEDmore
Kind Lynx
positive
  • CoursePHYS 160
hi! I had him for on-site PHYS 160, he’s one of my favorite profs all time 🙂 really good lectures that he somehow manages to make interesting by inserting kwento and is super understanding when it comes to deadlines, he’s also very kind! He asked my class if we wanted to have on-site classes during every scheduled class period, but we said no, and he gave us the option to only have classes on Mondays instead of both Mondays and Thursdays Phys 160 is a bit difficult but he always answered my questions really well even if I felt my questions were kind of dumb Do note that his class is a bit more difficult than the other phys 160 classes, but I don’t really have any regrets since what I learned in his class helped me a lot for csci 50 lab since it’s very circuit heavy. I have some friends who took another prof over bennett that didn’t learn all the same things I didmore
Anonymous
  • CoursePHYS 160

PHYS 160 short review: Giggle

Anonymous

Weird grading and all-sem group presentations

positive
  • LeniencyNo
Helo! Uh- A-able daw siya (sources cannot be confirmed) with effort. We mostly had group presentations for the entirety of the sem and ugh-- yes Grading is very weird <33 Personally, WAHAHAHAGAGAHA goodluck nalang (hsr has a better rng than the letter grades na binibigay niya <33)more
Vivid Urchin

Boring, lots of papers, no curve

negative
  • CourseSTS 10
  • WorkloadHeavy

got him for sts 10 - class is boring - a lot of papers - doesn't curve - grades decent B/B+

Earnest Urchin

Harder Phys 160, but it paid off for circuits

positive
  • CoursePHYS 160
  • Retake?Yes
He asked my class if we wanted to have on-site classes during every scheduled class period, but we said no, and he gave us the option to only have classes on Mondays instead of both Mondays and Thursdays Phys 160 is a bit difficult but he always answered my questions really well even if I felt my questions were kind of dumb Do note that his class is a bit more difficult than the other phys 160 classes, but I don’t really have any regrets since what I learned in his class helped me a lot for csci 50 lab since it’s very circuit heavy. I have some friends who took another prof over bennett that didn’t learn all the same things I didmore
Dapper Kite

Funny but grading is random; A almost impossible

positive
  • CourseSTS 10
  • Retake?No
  • 4.0 attainableNo
  • LeniencyNo
View all 2 replies Review on STS 10 SY 23-24 1st SEM: - Almost Impossible to get A and is super subjective (tho B+ is possible) - Gives 0 feedbacks throughout the sem - Funny and makes jokes - Isn’t strict - Doesn’t really teach - 2 Group Reporting of 45 min to 1 hr TLDR: Grading is super suspicious and random to say the least. NOT GOATEDmore

Teaching

MONTUEWEDTHUFRISAT
07:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:00
STS 10G-305STS 10 section D, lecture, MON 12:30 to 14:00, G-305
PHYS 162.01ICTC 506PHYS 162.01I section J, lecture, TUE 08:00 to 09:30, CTC 506STS 10G-305STS 10 section N, lecture, TUE 14:00 to 15:30, G-305STS 10G-305STS 10 section O, lecture, TUE 15:30 to 17:00, G-305
PHYS 162.02CTC 506PHYS 162.02 section LAB1-TU2, lab, WED 10:00 to 12:00, CTC 506
STS 10G-305STS 10 section D, lecture, THU 12:30 to 14:00, G-305
PHYS 162.01ICTC 506PHYS 162.01I section J, lecture, FRI 08:00 to 09:30, CTC 506STS 10G-305STS 10 section N, lecture, FRI 14:00 to 15:30, G-305STS 10G-305STS 10 section O, lecture, FRI 15:30 to 17:00, G-305

Not on the grid (2) : no schedule published yet

  • PHYS 199.1UNDERGRADUATE THESIS I2 u1 section
    • THES/DISS2ThesisNo schedule published
  • PHYS 199.3UNDERGRADUATE THESIS III1 u1 section
    • THES/DISS7ThesisNo schedule published

Students also read

Dayrit, Sophia Angeli S.Also teaches STS 103.7Buenafe, Olivia Erin M.Also teaches STS 102.1Olaguera, Lyndon Mark P.Also teaches PHYS 199.24.0

Report this page : a comment that should not be here, or a page about you that needs review.