Garcia, Leovino Ma. M. teaches at Ateneo de Manila University. Across 6 comments from students, they hold a rating of 2.9 out of 5. Of those comments, 2 read positive, 1 read mixed, 1 read neutral and 2 read negative. They are listed for 6 sections this term.
Garcia, Leovino Ma. M.
Ateneo de Manila University · 6 comments
What students said
positive 2
neutral 1
mixed 1
negative 2
Garcia, Leovino Ma. M.2.9
Background
Education · Career · Courses · PublicationsShowHide
PhD · PhL · Associate Professor · Professor-Emeritus
Philosophy (Paul Ricoeur, Emmanuel Levinas, contemporary French philosophy, phenomenology)
Education
PhD Philosophy, Université Catholique de Louvain
PhL Philosophy, Université Catholique de Louvain
BA Philosophy, Université Catholique de Louvain
AB Humanities
, Ateneo de Manila University
· 1965
Career
Associate Professor, Ateneo de Manila University · Department of Philosophy · current
Professor-Emeritus, Ateneo de Manila University · Department of Philosophy · current
Dean, School of Humanities, Ateneo de Manila University · School of Humanities
Dean, School of Arts and Sciences, Ateneo de Manila University · School of Arts and Sciences
Professor, University of Santo Tomas Graduate School · current
hi! sir garcia is a very nice prof and clearly very passionate about what he teaches, but i wouldn’t recommend if you’re looking to learn a lot from your philo class. i’d say i learned maybe 3 main points that he circled around throughout the sem.
LECTURES: sir’s relatively old, so he tends to be slow and monotonous during his lectures, so it becomes really tempting to cut class. there were a lot of times when he told the same stories and made the same points too. he’s pretty particular about manners — he calls out people who yawn or fall asleep and he changed our beadle just because they cut class once.
REQUIREMENTS: our entire grade this semester was based on (1) 4 papers (3 protocol, 1 final) and (2) class participation. he was going to have optional orals as bonus but opted not to so he could focus on grading out papers.
note: when assigning the protocol papers, he’d be very malabo in stating the topic/prompt. sometimes he’d change his mind so the class had to keep verifying. one time, he made handwritten notes from one of his lectures a requirement for our paper so people who cut class probably had to ask for notes from others.
WORKLOAD: relatively light because we were never explicitly required to read the given readings. aside from asking if we had any comments (usually after reading it as part of our lecture), we were never asked to write about them or anything.
GRADING: the papers were reflection-based, so relatively easy to write about — relating them to readings wasn’t required. i don’t know what his basis for grading was but it seems like a lot of the class got below B in the first one (he didnt return the rest). if you do end up taking his class, my advice would be to really try digging deep into the prompts he gave, make personal connections (i think he likes seeing insights that didn’t come from his lectures).
for participation, he gives everyone a chance to speak in simple activities so in terms of grading i think those + attendance is enough (though you’ll probably get higher if you recite voluntarily). he really encourages participation, remembers those who are active, and will call randomly if nobody volunteers. (take this with a grain of salt! not really sure how he graded participation)
OTHER: sir has been teaching for a really long time so he has a lot of stories and he taught a lot of the younger profs. he also really tries to get to know his students! i’d say he’s a very genuine prof
OVERALL: sir is very nice, but also malabo. pretty light workload and doable requirements, but not a lot of takeaways and ambiguous grading standards. i’m sure it’s different for everyone but i’d say his class is B-able with normal effort — B+able with a little moremore
Golden Wolf
GoldSunflower1950 helllooo!
neutral
helllooo! i think it’s a bit hard to get an A in his class. take this with a grain of salt tho since profs can change after a year!
iirc i dont think any of my friends in that class got an A and again majority of the grades in the class for the first paper were low (as in B was considered high).. BUT my friends and i weren’t the most active in participating so maybe that would’ve increased our chances? not really sure though hahahamore
Swift Urchin
Would not recommend, guessing in class the whole term
positive
Retake?No
I would not recommend him defo. I got him only because he was the last class that had slots open. Id rather work my ass off in other profs, listen to their good lectures, and do their requirements to get an A than guessing every time in class if he will be teaching something worthwhile, and not knowing what my final grade would be because we didnt do a single thing in class :))more
All comments
Anonymous
negative
wag haha no joke
Happy Finch
Sleep in class, grade hangs on one final oral
negative
Retake?No
LeniencyNo
WorkloadLight
Take him if you want to sleep in class, and your grade to be depending on one final orals (literally our only requirement for the class. syllabus was given like middle of the semester already, and was never followed)more
2 repliesHide replies
Gentle Otter
would you say you wouldn’t recommend him because of that?